|
Dear
Mr Bennet,
Thank
you for your letter dated 8 March. We had a capacity
crowd of 150 people at our meeting - the largest
number of people we had to date in our Politics
21 series. The points you raised in your letter
were indeed touched on by some of our speakers.
However, given the duration of three hours, only
so much discussion on the various issues was possible.
However,
I want to take this opportunity to point out that
of the many issues you raised in your letter,
one thing that was absent was the right to be
free from fear. The presence of fear - real or
imagined - has an interesting effect on Singaporeans
and foreigners alike, even international civil
society organisations. It prevents groups and
individuals from exercising their civil liberties
as provided for within the law. Instead many opt
for self-censorship or act as gatekeepers by censoring
others who explore the full potential of the law.
Nevertheless, an important concern that was raised
at the forum was whether there should be some
kind of initiative to bring the process one step
forward. Several ideas were thrown up, one of
which was the formation of a human rights study
committee to consider the needs of Singaporeans.
The Think Centre has offered to lead this initiative
to set up a study committee.
Another equally important issue that was raised
was the need to bring a comparative perspective
into the discussion of human rights. The advantage
of learning from other models, both Western and
Asian, was underscored as significant for moving
the process forward.
In this respect, the Think Centre, would like
to host a study group meeting in Singapore to
consider what are some of ways forward for a Singaporean
human rights response. The meeting we envision
would include a cross section of human rights
organisations and resource persons both from outside
and within the region to dialogue with interested
Singaporeans.
We
like to invite Amnesty International to Singapore
to attend. Or even consider co-organising it us.
We would also be engaging interested groups and
individuals as we develop our study group meeting.
The format, date, venue and duration can be discussed
separately.
The record attendance at the forum and the larger
interest outside of the forum suggest to us that
there is sufficient appeal and interest now to
move the process forward. The challenge would
lie in managing the journey.
Yours sincerely,
James Gomez
Think Centre
Back
to top |